91直播

Menu
  • Menu
  • Campus Map
  • Directory
  • Search
2021 Accreditation, Midterm Report. 91直播.

Why should I use the Chrome Browser to View the Midterm Report?

    • Full Midterm Report
    • Cover

      2021 Midterm Report Cover with a saxaphone, a horse, a greenhouse, and lab

    • Title Page

      2021 Midterm Report

      Submitted by
      Mt. San Antonio Community College
      1100 N. Grand Ave, Walnut, CA 91789-1341

      Submitted to
      Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges,
      Western Association of Schools and Colleges

      March 2021

      February 1, 2021, Final Draft

    • Certification of the 2021 Midterm Report
    • Table of Contents

      Table of Contents

      • Certification of the 2021 Midterm Report
      • Statement of Report Preparation
        • Spring 2020
        • Summer 2020
        • Fall 2020
        • 2021
        • Midterm Report Timeline
      • Plans Arising from the Self-Evaluation Process
      • Institutional Reporting on Quality Improvements
      • Response to Team Recommendations for Improvement
        • Response to Recommendation 1
        • Response to Recommendation 2
        • Response to Recommendation 3
      • Reflection on Improving Institutional Performance
        • Student Learning Outcomes
        • Institution-set Standards
      • Report on Quality Focus Essay: Progress and Outcomes from Action Projects
        • PIE Dashboards
        • Budget
        • Board of Trustee Dialogue
        • Conclusion
        • Plans and Common Goals
        • Coordination of Academic Support Resources
        • Creating and Institutionalizing a Structure
        • The Student Experience
        • Supporting Innovation
        • Creating Community
        • Research
        • Integration of Metrics into 91直播 Review
        • Integration of Plans
        • Pathways
      • Most Recent Annual Reports Submitted by College
        • ACCJC 2020 Annual Fiscal Report
        • ACCJC 2020 Annual Data Report
      • Appendices
        • Appendix A: List of Evidence
        • Appendix B: List of Acronyms
    • Statement of Report Preparation

      Statement of Report Preparation

      In March of 2020 the 91直播鈥檚 (Mt. 91直播) Accreditation Steering Committee (ASC), a standing shared governance committee that guides the process used for campuswide involvement in accreditation, proposed and approved a timeline and process for preparing the 2021 Midterm Report (see timeline included). This timeline and process was then approved by the President鈥檚 Advisory Council (PAC), a shared governance council, and represents a collaboration between the administration, faculty, staff, and students. There were many steps in the process that provided intentional opportunities for constituency leaders to inform their members about the report, review it, and give feedback thus allowing the campus to address questions and give input for the 2021 Midterm Report.

      Mt. 91直播鈥檚 2021 Midterm Report timeline lays out the process used to guide the work done by all members involved and to demonstrate to the College community the progress being made. It provides a one-page, easy-to-read guide for what was accomplished and what was still to be accomplished. This updated document was shared at numerous venues including ASC and PAC meetings, Board of Trustees鈥 meetings, and constituency meetings across the campus.

      This Midterm Report also describes and provides evidence for the plans arising from the self-evaluation process and describes Mt. 91直播鈥檚 response to the External Evaluation Team recommendations meant to enhance institutional improvements and effectiveness, most specifically the team鈥檚 recommendations regarding Standards II.A.3, II.A.8, and IV.A.7. In addition, this report includes the ACCJC 2020 Annual Report on student achievement and the Annual Fiscal Report.

      The final version of the 2021 Midterm Report was submitted to and approved at the Board of Trustees February 2021 meeting.

      Midterm Report Timeline

      Spring 2020

      • Organization Meeting, February 27 - Completed
      • ASC Approves Timeline, April 17 鈥 Completed
      • Gather Data & Draft, March and April - Completed
      • IEC/PAC/651/262/Faculty Association/Classified Senate/Academic Senate April Feedback to ASC
        • Academic Senate (Discussion)
          • Senate Executive Board 鈥 April 23 (Partial Draft Discussion Item)
          • Senate Executive Board 鈥 May 7 (Full Draft as Action)
          • Full Senate 鈥 May 14 (Discussion Item)
          • Full Senate (May 21 (Action Item)
          • Academic Senate Feedback to ASC by June 1st
      • ASC Reviews Draft, Send out for feedback in late April - Completed
      • Academic Senate/PAC, May 2020 to June 2020, Provide feedback to ASCCompleted

      Summer 2020

      • Touch up and edits in June and July - Completed

      Fall 2020

      • Sunshine Full Report and Campuswide Feedback, August 鈥 Completed
      • Finalize Report (September), Due to Academic Senate Secretary, September 28鈥 Completed
      • Academic Senate Approval 鈥 Completed
        • Academic Senate Executive Board Reading, October 1
        • Academic Senate Executive Board Reading, October 15
        • Full Academic Senate, October 22 (Discussion Item)
        • Full Academic Senate, November 12 (Action Item)
      • Academic Senate Approval, Full Academic Senate 鈥 December 3 (Action If Needed) 鈥 Completed

      2021

      • Board 鈥 First Reading, January 2021
      • Board Action, February 2021
      • ACCJC Submission Due March 17, 2021
    • Plans Arising out of the Self Evaluation Process

      Plans Arising from the Self-Evaluation Process

      91直播 continues to engage in institutional effectiveness efforts and looks forward to its continued work on quality assurance. The table below outlines the plans for change and improvement arising out of the self-evaluation and includes a synopsis of the outcomes and future actions as the College continues to focus discussions and seek input prior to beginning its next Institutional Self-Evaluation Report (ISER).

      Table 1. Plans Arising from the Self-Evaluation Process

      Theme and Standards Change / Improvement Completion Date Outcome(s) Future Action(s)
      College Mission: I.A.1, I.A.2, and I.A.3
      • PAC reviewed the Mission
      • Mission was revised
      • Uses the Mission in evaluation
      February 2016
      • Mission accurately reflects the intention of the College
      • Continue with annual Mission review by PAC
      Outcomes: I.C.3 and II.A.12
      • OC created a process for transitioning to ILOs
      • Academic Senate passed Resolution 2016 鈥 02 Urging Faculty to Complete Institutional Level Outcome Mapping
      • OC created a process for tracking completion of 91直播 Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
      September 2016
      • ILOs and PLOs are assessed as part of the outcomes process
      • The results of ILOs and PLOs are used for improvement
      • PLOs are listed for each program in the College Catalog
      • Continue with regular review by the OC
      Library: II.B.1
      • The Curriculum Liaison provided evidence of a library as a sign-off as part of the curriculum review process
      n/a
      • This perceived gap was determined not to exist when evidence was reviewed
      • Continue with regular review of the process
      Evaluation: II.A.5
      • Human Resources identified each group鈥檚 evaluation procedures and shared them with the ASC
      n/a
      • This perceived gap was determined not to exist when evidence was reviewed
      • Continue with regular review of the process
      Online Instruction: III.C.4
      • The DLC identified training opportunities for students and shared them with the ASC
      n/a
      • This perceived gap was determined not to exit when evidence was  reviewed
      • Continue with regular review of the process
      • ASC=Accreditation Steering Committee
      • DLC=Distance Learning Committee
      • ILOs=Institutional Learning Outcomes
      • OC=Outcomes Committee
      • PAC=President鈥檚 Advisory Council
      • PLOs=91直播 Level Outcomes

      Note: The action plans resulting from the Self-Evaluation process are addressed in the Quality Focus Essay. (2-plans-1)

    • Institutional Reporting on Quality Improvements

      Institutional Reporting on Quality Improvements

      The comprehensive external evaluation team for the College鈥檚 Visiting Team鈥檚 Evaluation Report, conducted in fall 2017, noted no recommendations to meet standards and only three recommendations for improvement (see page five of Visiting Team鈥檚 Evaluation Report). Each is provided below along with the College鈥檚 response. (3-qual-1)

      Response to Team Recommendations for Improvement:

        • Recommendation 1

          Recommendation 1:

          In order to improve and fulfill the intent of the Standard, the team recommends that students receive syllabi in all class sections, which include learning outcomes for the course rather than a link to a website that contains the SLO statements. (II.A.3)

          Response:

          The 91直播 Outcomes Committee first reviewed the 2017 ACCJC Letter and Visiting Team Report at its September 19, 2017, meeting. Per the recommendation, the Outcomes Committee (OC) discussed their role in identifying ways to 鈥渋mprove and fulfill the intent of the Standard鈥 at the October 3, 2017, meeting by first reviewing Academic Senate Resolution 16-09 鈥淚ncluding Student Learning Outcomes [(SLOs)] as Part of Course Syllabi,鈥 which states:

          The 91直播 Academic Senate has previously tacitly supported the inclusion of SLOs in the syllabus task force recommendations (approved March 20, 2014), stating, 鈥淥ur task force recommends the attached syllabus guidelines in order to鈥 meet the accreditation requirement that SLOs be publicly accessible鈥 and in the Outcomes Plan update (approved May 22, 2014), stating, 鈥渇aculty are to publish their SLOs on course syllabi or provide a link that directs students to this information.鈥

          The committee subsequently created The Style Guide Task Force to investigate questions raised by the Academic Senate on how faculty across campus programs would ensure the inclusion of 鈥learning outcomes for the course rather than a link to a website that contains the SLO statements鈥 and to provide suggestions on how to best communicate SLOs to students. At the November 21, 2017, meeting the Outcomes Committee recommended that the campus implement ACCJC鈥檚 recommendation and the recommendation was then accepted by the Curriculum & Instruction Council and sent to the Academic Senate for discussion and subsequent approval. The recommendation that 鈥淚n every class section students receive a course syllabus that includes learning outcomes from the institution鈥檚 officially approved course outline.鈥 was approved by the Academic Senate on April 12, 2018. (II.A.3) (3-qual-2, 3-qual-3, 3-qual-4, 3-qual-5, 3-qual-6)

          Since the official approval and adoption of SLOs on syllabi, Mt. 91直播 Divisions began the automated collection of faculty syllabi through a Smartsheet form created and shared by the Business Division. As part of the collection process, syllabi are reviewed by Division staff and checked for SLOs. If any are missing, faculty are asked to add the missing SLOs and resubmit. In fact, many Divisions began collecting this information in 2017, and the Smartsheet database provides the College with the ability to pull and audit all campus syllabi to ensure that the college is following ACCJC Standards. (3-qual-7)

        • Recommendation 2

          Recommendation 2:

          In order to improve, the team recommends that the College develop institutional procedures for development, implementation, and evaluation of department-wide examinations to ensure processes are in place to reduce test bias and enhance reliability. These procedures should include participation of the Institutional Research Department. (II.A.8)

          Response:

          The College has been surprised by this recommendation. The 2017 Team Report cites no list of department wide examinations which the College could review, and repeated attempts by department chairs, deans, managers, and members of the Accreditation Steering Committee have been unable to identify such examinations in use. The only exception is examinations created by external accrediting and licensing bodies, which are thoroughly vetted before being deployed. Nevertheless, the College has used this recommendation to review and ensure that its practices are sound. In response to the team's recommendation, 91直播 examined how discipline faculty review examinations for face and content validity and ensure common implementation of the examinations. In fact, faculty have discipline wide procedures for development, implementation, and evaluation of their examinations, and this aligns more authentically with the way the disciplines function within a department that may have more than one discipline.

          The College investigated the current status of department wide exams and the feasibility of extending such processes across the College and found very few instances of their use. It determined that for department wide exams to be feasible, assessment items would need to address mastery of the same concepts in all courses in that department regardless of subdiscipline or position in a sequence. For example, the Department of Biological Sciences includes courses in Human Sexuality, Anthropology, Zoology, Microbiology, and Human Prosection. The first two have no Biology prerequisite; the next two require Biology 1 and/or 4 as a prerequisite; and the last requires both Biology 4 and Anatomy 35. It is difficult to develop an examination item that meaningfully assesses mastery across all these courses (Course Catalog). (3-qual-8)

          Thus, the College found that rather than having department wide examinations, a more effective means to reduce test bias and increase reliability might be to institute an exam across all concurrent sections of the same course. For instance, the Nursing program offers courses that range from five weeks to 11 weeks. The Nursing 91直播 Exams are given on a scantron and placed into a system called ParScore. The Item Analysis Report (IA) in ParScore examines the recorded student responses to the questions so that faculty can access the quality of those question items and the exam as a whole. The IA Report helps point out ambiguous or troublesome questions. (3-qual-9)

          In compliance with state Assembly Bill 705 (AB 705), the College has shifted its placement practices for English, English as a Second Language, Mathematics and Reading. The College now uses an Assessment Questionnaire that collects high school GPAs, high school course grades, and other information relevant to assessment. Based on this information, students are given placements into transfer-level math and English courses, along with guidance about recommended support courses. In fact, the College began moving toward this model in advance of the effective date of AB 705 to increase access and better support students in these gateway courses.

          As part of the College鈥檚 content review process, courses with new requisites or advisories are evaluated using student success rates to determine disproportionate impact on students. If such an impact is identified, the Content Review Committee notifies department chairs; thereafter, faculty within the discipline address the impact and determine whether curricular changes are needed.

          Some Career Education (CE) programs offer students the opportunity of attempting industry-specific qualifying exams for certification or licensure. These optional exams do not affect students鈥 grades, and external entities or agencies are responsible for their administration and for the validity and reliability of the exams. Examples include: National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX), a nationwide examination for the licensing of nurses in the United States and Canada; Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) licenses and certificates; Real Estate Sales and Broker exams administered by the Real Estate Commissioner at the California Department of Real Estate; and Histotechnician exam administered by American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP). For the Registered Veterinary Technician program, students take the Veterinary Technician鈥檚 National Exam (VTNE).

          Mt. 91直播 continues to be aware of the team's recommendation and will remain vigilant regarding the evaluation of existing discipline wide assessments of prior learning and test bias. Procedures will continue to include, but not be limited to, discipline faculty studying the examinations and course content review validity as well as ensuring common implementation of the examinations.

        • Recommendation 3

          Recommendation 3:

          In order to improve its governance processes and structures, the team recommends that the College evaluate the overall governance structure on a regular and continuous basis and use the results as the basis for improvement. (IV.A.7)

          Response:

          It was clear during the 2017 visit that the Team had difficulty assimilating the governance structure of the College. This was no challenge for members of the College, where the structure and process are generally understood. Mt. 91直播 committees are divided into four broad categories: Governance, Operational, Academic Senate, and Other.

          College Governance committees (e.g., Accreditation, Budget, Professional Development) are comprised of representatives from all constituent groups, including student representatives, who participate in college-wide decision-making, planning, accreditation, and institutional effectiveness processes relevant to each committee鈥檚 purpose and function. Operational Committees oversee areas of administrative responsibility, not specific to college constituent groups but overseeing operations, student, and campus issues, such as the Basic Needs, Employee Wellness, Professional Development, and VOICES Committees.

          Academic Senate committees include those committees for which the College relies primarily or seeks mutual agreement with the Academic Senate (e.g., Assessment, Curriculum, Distance Education, Student Learning Outcomes, etc.). These committees typically include members from the college administration and the Academic Senate. Committees designated as 鈥淥ther鈥 are typically 鈥渂ig picture鈥 committees, such as 鈥淢aster Plan Steering鈥 or committees dedicated to specific functions, such as the 鈥淪alary and Leaves鈥 committee (related to faculty).

          Virtually all committees include faculty, staff, managers, and students, each appointed by their respective leadership bodies. These committees engage in ongoing and regular self-reviews by analyzing their accomplishments, reviewing their goals, and evaluating their membership for appropriate representation. Each committee identifies agenda items and outcomes related to accreditation standards and tracks those for the self-study each cycle. The committees then report these findings to President鈥檚 Advisory Council, which then reviews each committee鈥檚 self-evaluations and recommends and/or approves changes to the committee鈥檚 purpose and function, membership, or goals as appropriate.

          It is through these committees and their self-evaluations each year that Mt. 91直播 evaluates the overall governance structure, and then uses this evaluation to determine whether the governance structure is effective and inclusive and where improvements can be made to ensure faculty, staff, and students have the opportunity to express their opinions at the campus level, to ensure that these opinions are given every reasonable consideration, ensure the right to participate effectively in district and college governance, and to ensure the right of academic senates to assume primary responsibility for making recommendations in the areas of curriculum and academic standards.

          This is the process used to evaluate the overall governance structure as a basis for continuous improvement. Furthermore, to maintain transparency with the campus community, each committee has a web page where information about these committees, their minutes, relevant documents, and a list of the membership is posted and maintained regularly for anyone鈥檚 inspection. This ongoing and annual process helps to inform the campus and community about college governance for self-evaluation and continuous quality improvement.

          In specific response to the team's recommendation, 91直播鈥檚 Senate Executive Board created the Academic Senate Executive Board Task Force on Structure in their September 19, 2019, meeting. The charge of the Task Force was to evaluate and recommend changes to the Academic Senate council and committee structure. The Task Force would review the committee structure to ensure that it could support the integration of Guided Pathways, student equity, learning, success, and sustainability, as well as ensuring other academic and professional policies and procedures were being appropriately addressed as part of the shared governance process. The members of the Academic Senate Executive Board Task Force on Structure met to discuss and evaluate the governance structure at the College. Recommendations were passed by the Academic Senate and mutually agreed to the Academic Mutual Agreement Council (AMAC). Mt. 91直播 Board Policy (BP) 3255 establishes which academic and professional matters the faculty, acting through the Academic Senate, shall be relied primarily upon, as well as which matters will be mutually agreed upon. AMAC is the venue in which the president and co-vice presidents of the Academic Senate discuss items that require mutual agreement with the vice presidents of Student Services and Instruction and the College president. Although the Senate committee structure covers those areas for which the faculty are primarily relied upon, there are components of the implementation of the structure that required mutual agreement (for example, membership which included Administrators). Discussion at AMAC also helped to clarify the Purpose & Function documents for new committees. As a result of the Academic Senate discussions, changes were made to the committee reporting structure, and additional committees were created. (3-qual-10, 3-qual-11)

          Mt. 91直播 Academic Senate Committees Structure:

          Mt. 91直播 Senate Committees Structure long description following paragraph

          The Mt. 91直播 Academic Senate Committees Structure map illustrates the flow of that information and recommendations follow through the shared governance process for areas under the purview of Academic Senate. All of the councils and committees strive to integrate the goals of Sustainability, Student Equity, Student Learning, and Student Success, and Guided Pathways. The map also shows AMAC, the Academic Mutual Agreement Council in the top left, to show the flow for academic and professional recommendations that require mutual agreement between the Academic Senate and District Administrators. The map also shows the relationships between the three Senate councils: Curriculum and Instruction Council, Faculty Professional Development Council, Student Preparation, Equity, and Achievement Council, the committees of these councils, the Guided Pathways Cross-Council Committee, and Senate Awards, Equivalency, and Nominations, Elections & Leadership Development committees in relation to each other.

          Note: All senate committee Purpose & Function statements will include Sustainability, Guided Pathways, Accreditation, and Equity. Approved by Senate 12/5/2019, updated June 2020 to reflect AMAC mutual agreement

    • Reflection on Improving Institutional Performance

      Reflection on Improving Institutional Performance:

        • Student Learning Outcomes

          Student Learning Outcomes

          The College has actively sought out faculty, staff, and administration input to reflect on the College鈥檚 assessment processes and to collect the data necessary to respond to the questions below on student learning outcomes for instructional programs and student learning support services.

          1. What are the strengths of the process that helps lead the college to improve teaching and learning?

            Mt. 91直播鈥檚 most important resources for ongoing improvement of teaching and learning are its ongoing commitment to professional development on the part of faculty and staff and its well-funded Professional & Organizational Development program to meet those needs.

            Mt. 91直播 conducts outcomes assessment to sustain and improve success in teaching, learning, and the delivery of services. The strengths of our process can be summarized in three categories: 1) systematic campuswide process, 2) continual communication and training, and 3) support and cooperation from administrators, staff, and faculty. These strengths are due to the cohesive rapport among stakeholders concerning outcomes. Although all three components are interrelated, we will discuss each individually.

            1. Systematic Campuswide Process

              The Outcomes Committee (OC) provides leadership, training, tools, and support to create a campus culture where outcomes are understood and valued and where assessment functions as a resource leading to improved instruction, curricula, programs, and/or services. The committee oversees outcomes assessment at the administrative unit, course, program, and institutional levels, and reports to the Academic Senate through the Curriculum and Instruction Council. There are two co-chairs of the OC, one manager and one faculty; together, they are responsible for conducting the bimonthly meetings, recording the minutes, and assisting with campuswide outcomes assessment (see OC Goals and Progress Reports 2017-2018). To ensure equal representation, members of the OC are comprised of faculty and managers from different divisions, staff and managers from student services, one representative from Research and Institutional Effectiveness Office, and one student representative; the College values students鈥 contributions. In addition, committee members also serve as liaisons for their respective department, division, or group. (4-perf-1)

              SLOs for courses are included on all course syllabi to ensure transparency. SLOs are assessed and reported every four years; data are reported when the course is updated through the curriculum review cycle. Members of the OC perform both quantitative and qualitative review of the SLOs for a random 20% of these courses when they are updated. As of April 2020, 93% of courses have reported their SLOs, methods of assessment, criteria for success, summaries of data, and use of data. The reporting of the findings related to SLOs, especially how the data have been or will be used to inform future changes, have fostered continuous improvement and understanding of courses, programs, and student support.

            1. Continual Communication and Training

              Through a collaborative effort with Information Technology, there are monthly workshops on Nuventive, the program used to store all outcomes data for the campus. Additional training workshops on writing SLOs, highlighting successful SLOs, mapping outcomes for program improvements, and connecting outcomes to Guided Pathways for Success (GPS) have also been offered at FLEX Days as well as during the academic semesters. The OC has developed the Outcomes Assessment Style Guide with templates and examples of appropriate SLOs in Chemistry, Math, Music, Nutrition, and US History. The templates should help faculty in all disciplines when writing SLOs. In addition, these templates have sections for faculty to complete regarding method of assessment, criterion for success, summary of data, and use of data. These sections on the templates will guide faculty in reporting the SLO findings in the four-year review cycle. When necessary, the OC has hosted special events to share information about outcomes assessment. For example, the Winter Summit in January 2019 brought together the OC, campus leaders in GPS and AB 705, to increase awareness, foster collaboration, and minimize duplication of effort. Faculty and staff are involved in training and communication at the classroom, department, division, and institution levels as they participate in the Outcomes process in a continuous cycle.

            1. Support and Cooperation

              The Mt. 91直播 President鈥檚 Office created the President's Awards for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching and Learning through Outcomes Assessment to grant up to four cash awards totaling $6,000 annually for excellence and innovation in teaching and learning through Outcomes Assessment. The winners have been highlighted within the campus community. Additionally, the vice president of Instruction has offered up to two hours per year, per part-time faculty, to gather and work on course SLOs. The SLOs resulting from these meetings are reported to the OC. Furthermore, the division offices have been instrumental in reminding faculty when courses and SLOs are due for updates and/or when they are overdue. Faculty and staff cooperate to deliver the best educational experiences for our students by working with departments, divisions, and the institution toward developing a culture of Outcomes as a means of assessment and improvement.

          2. What growth opportunities in the assessment process has the college identified to further refine its authentic culture of assessment?

            Mt 91直播 is a large institution with regular retirements and newly hired employees of diverse backgrounds, training, and experience. The OC has tried to monitor the campus culture on assessment by conducitng random surveys, such as the one of people entering the print shop at select hours during one week in September 2019. This attempt captured 119 responses (62 from part-time faculty, 41 from full-time faculty, and 16 from others) and revealed 40% of part-time faculty and 63% of full-time faculty did not understand the benefits of SLOs. The majority of faculty wanted a clearer explanation of the purpose of SLOs and failed to connect SLOs to student success.

            Likewise, in March 2020, 20 newly hired full-time faculty attended a presentation on outcomes and the assessment process at Mt 91直播. The majority (80%) had some familiarity with SLOs and many spoke enthusiastically about SLOs. A few also raised concerns that not all of their department colleagues shared their enthusiasm and expressed frustration with a lack of dialogue among their peers about course SLOs.

            These two separate events indicate a need for more focused professional development opportunities and a need to improve the general campus understanding of outcomes and assessment. To this end, the OC will distribute the SLO Style Guide, mentioned above, more broadly in the future via the website, campus announcements, and qualitative review. We will also continue to offer stand-alone workshops, as mentioned above. According to Albert Einstein, the definition of insanity is "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." Therefore, the OC is discussing two new strategies to increase awareness and outreach: Faculty Learning Community (FLC) and Education Research (ER). In spring 2020, some members of the OC piloted a Faculty Learning Community (FLC), centered around reading and discussing the book Outcomes-Based Assessment for Learner-Centered Education (2007) by Driscoll, A. and Wood, S. This small pilot will help us determine if we can scale up the FLC to include more faculty. Unlike the stand-alone workshops we currently offer, FLC is ongoing, meeting twice a month through the entire semester or year, allowing for opportunities to build trust and to facilitate deep sharing about assessment and outcomes. We will evaluate the effectiveness of our FLC at the end of the review of the book.

            In addition, the OC is considering the introduction of Educational Research (ER) as a new perspective on improving student success, supported by assessment of outcomes. According to the American Educational Research Association, they define educational research as follows:

            Education research is the scientific field of study that examines education and learning processes and the human attributes, interactions, organizations, and institutions that shape educational outcomes. Scholarship in the field seeks to describe, understand, and explain how learning takes place throughout a person鈥檚 life and how formal and informal contexts of education affect all forms of learning. Education research embraces the full spectrum of rigorous methods appropriate to the questions being asked and also drives the development of new tools and methods (AERA, What is Education Research). (4-perf-2)

            Mt. 91直播鈥檚 Title V recruited faculty to serve as data coaches from all divisions. The OC hopes to partner with Title V and these data coaches to promote ER throughout the campus. Some faculty, particularly in the Sciences, are already conducting ER on a small scale. One example is shared in the next section.

          3. Provide examples where course, program, or service improvements have occurred based on outcomes assessment data.

            Mt. 91直播 evaluates course offerings, student learning, workshops, and services provided to students. The information obtained from the outcomes and other indirect outcomes are used for continual improvement in and to advocate for new services. Although not all faculty understand the value of SLOs, there are many examples of increased student success resulting from innovative interventions supported by outcomes assessment data. The winners of the President鈥檚 Award certainly belong in this category. Beyond these elite few, there are others deserving of recognition.

            Dr. Karen Marston, a professor of Music who won the President鈥檚 Award in 2019, observed her students struggling with proficiency at playing technical exercises (SLO #2) and preparing a full solo work (SLO #3) with only 34% successful in playing major scales in thirds. She created a 4-level curriculum for applied instruction, petitioned faculty to split the solo performance and technical studies into two different exams, and organized a weekly instrumental lab for students to perform for each other and to receive feedback. Assessments in spring 2017 and fall 2018 showed all students, except for one, met the target criteria, scoring 70% or above, for technique. The technical and musical performance grade average was in the 80th percentile (see Application Marston Music). (4-perf-3)

            Professor Christina Cammayo teaches Nutrition for Health (NF 10). One of the SLOs states a student will be able to analyze food intake and compare that to the recommended goals. In Fall 2016, 81% of her students achieved this outcome. Concerned about the 19% who did not meet this SLO, she created an in-class group assignment for students to analyze food intake, determine which foods belong to which food groups, determine appropriate serving sizes, and compare food intake to recommended goals. After this group assignment, students felt more confident in completing the assignment on their own. In spring 2017, 91% of her students achieved this SLO (see NF 10 SLO Data). (4-perf-4)

            Dr. David Charbonneau, Director of the Writing Center (WC), shares data showing how the WC improves student success and retention in English classes. He also shares demographic data showing how students of all races and ethnicities are benefitting; this is proportional to the Mt. 91直播 student population. One of the interventions is placement of tutors in the classroom (TC). In fall 2017 to spring 2018, 358 students enrolled in English 90. Among students with TC support, 79.8% were successful, 13.5% unsuccessful, and 6.7% withdrew from the class. Compared to their peers who did not have TC support, 52.8% were successful, 26.7% unsuccessful, and 20.5% withdrew. Similar findings were reported for students with TC in English 1A + 80 in spring 2017 to spring 2018 involving 208 students. For those with TC support, 78.2% were successful, 14.9% unsuccessful, and 6.9% withdrew. Their peers without TC support were 54.2% successful, 27.1% unsuccessful, and 18.7% withdrew. These successes have greatly expanded the practice of the TC 91直播, and in return, it has positively impacted thousands of students while simultaneously improving our AB 705 English outcomes.

            Faculty, staff, and managers in the Library, Learning Resources, and Distance Learning Division;which includes Tutoring, Library, Distance Learning, Academic Support and Achievement Center (A91直播), and Learning Assistance鈥攃ontinue to incorporate Outcomes in course review, syllabi, workshops, annual division retreats, and annual reports such as Planning for Institutional Effectiveness (PIE). Adjunct faculty and part-time staff are paid for their work on Outcomes as all viewpoints are valued. These efforts have resulted in data collection being used to make changes in learning support services including, but not limited to, library collections (quantity, currency, depth, and variety), tutoring, learning centers, computer laboratories, learning technology, and ongoing instruction for users of library and other learning support services. Tutoring has been particularly active in using outcome data as we move forward in the GPS effort.

            Lastly, a group of Biology faculty has been conducting Education Research by comparing the impact of kinesthetic activity to repetition on student learning. In Fall 2019, Professors Danielle Dervishian, Tyler Flisik, Karyn Kakiba-Russell, Janine Kido, Anthony X. Lopez, and David Moskovitz either introduced an active learning exercise involving a short kinesthetic dance activity or used the time to reiterate the lecture on the anatomy of the heart and blood flow through the cardiovascular system in their General Biology courses. Of 217 students who participated, 67 listened to reiteration of lecture, 77 passively watched their peers perform the kinesthetic dance, and 73 actively participated in the kinesthetic activity. All students were given the same four pre-activity quiz questions and the identical four questions after the activity to measure learning gained. A different faculty, not one of the six mentioned above, graded all the pre- and post-quizzes. The cumulative gain between the pre- and post-activity quiz scores was 66.5 points in the lecture group, 119.5 points in the passive observing group, and 135 points in the actively dancing group. According to these findings, active learning with kinesthetic activity results in higher retention of knowledge than lecture (see Bio1 Active Learning Data). (4-perf-5)

          4. In those areas where assessment may be falling behind, what is the college doing to complete the assessments per the college鈥檚 schedule?

            Annually, members of the OC review the SLO assessment data from the list of courses that are updating through the curriculum review process. The OC checks all courses on the list quantitatively for the data and a random 30% of courses qualitatively for the actual SLOs. Courses that do not have SLO or SLO data are reported to the Curriculum & Instruction Council as well as to the vice president of Instruction who then notifies the division deans and chairpersons of the respective departments. The faculty Co-chair of OC will also report these courses to the Academic Senate. Faculty of these courses have one year to provide the missing SLO or SLO assessment data or risk having these courses deactivated.

            The OC recognizes that COVID-19 has brought a tremendous extra amount of work for everyone. The OC understands that assessing outcomes may not be a top priority in spring 2020 or fall 2020. However, all faculty are encouraged to try to continue the assessment process to the best of their abilities. Should they fall behind, they are encouraged to try to catch up within one year. For now, the OC wants to keep the assessment process as constant as possible. Nuventive report shows that 93% of our courses are up to date on the assessment cycle as of October 2020.

        • Institution-set Standards

          Institution-set Standards

          Each year the Accreditation Steering Committee (ASC), the Institutional Effectiveness Committee (IEC), and the President鈥檚 Advisory Council (PAC) use interactive techniques to engage committee members in the process of reviewing its Institution-set Standards (ISS) and to determine the actions necessary for ensuring academic quality, student achievement, and student learning. Members are also given time to take drafts of the report to each of their constituency groups for reflection and feedback.

          Based on the data from the Annual Report to ACCJC in 2020 (see Most Recent Annual Reports Submitted by the College), the College鈥檚 reflections on these Midterm Report required questions reveal a transparent reflection process.

          • Has the college met its floor standards?

            • Yes, the Institution-set Standards are the minimum (aka floor) the College will accept. The College has met its floor standards. The minor fluctuations in some metrics are not of great concern as they are typical for these metrics.

          • Has the college achieved its stretch (aspirational) goals?

            • The College was to create its aspirational goals in spring 2020. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic forced the College to temporarily close physical campus operations, move classes online, and transition employees into telecommuters. This abrupt shift disrupted many of the College鈥檚 normal operations in order to achieve essential functions. As such, the aspirational goals were set in fall 2020.

          • What initiative(s) is the college undertaking to improve its outcomes?

            • The College continuously focuses on quality improvement. To that end, the College created many programs and changed many services to improve these metrics since its 2017 ISER. These additions compliment the needs of the College鈥檚 students:

              • Dual Enrollment
              • EAB Navigate
              • Expanded Professional Development
              • Guided Pathways
              • Mountie Fresh (food pantry)
              • President Equity Commitments
              • Pride Center
              • Strong Workforce 91直播
              • Title V Grant (2019-2024): Creating an Equity-minded Campus Culture to Improve Student Outcomes
              • New committees have been launched including: Textbook & Instructional Materials, Persistence & Retention, and Mapping & Catalog
          • How does the college inform its constituents of this information?

            • Governance meetings are used to inform members of this work as well as to engage them in an interactive process to contribute to this work.
            • The Institutional Effectiveness Committee minutes include the ISS work as well as the Accreditation Steering Committee and the President鈥檚 Advisory Council minutes.
            • Several initiatives on campus make quarterly reports to the President鈥檚 Cabinet and these reports are shared with the campus community online in Cabinet Notes.

          It is important to note that the College is asked to provide many data points on different metrics to other state and federal agencies. What is discussed in this ACCJC Midterm Report is only focused on the 2020 ACCJC Annual Report data metrics provided per the specifications of the Commission. As such, the data tables below illustrate Mt. 91直播 Institution-set Standards, stretch goals, and completion rates for course completion, certificates awarded, degrees awarded, and student transfers to four-year institutions.

          For each goal, ASC and IEC discussed it from many different perspectives. At the October 2, 2020, meeting, ASC proposed new goals for 2019-20 to 2021-22. The goals were created using a collaborative dialog process focusing on the current and future realities for our students, the College, and California. Of course, an important part of this discussion was the impact of the current pandemic (i.e., COVID-19) on the 2019-20 student achievement as well as the future results. The course success outcomes were higher when including new pandemic grades in the calculations or lower if not included. The group felt that the College faculty are always beginning with the hope that 100% of their students will pass the course but felt that a 100% pass rate might seem too hard to achieve at this time. The group also discussed the realities impacting some of these numbers such as semi-automatic issuing of certificates and degrees in one year that may not be sustained in future years. In addition, some courses are not able to be offered online which may impact students鈥 ability to secure a particular program鈥檚 award. Some students are being accepted to transfer to a four-year institution and because of the current circumstances are deferring their admittance and going to community college instead, thus reducing the College鈥檚 transfer numbers. In the end, these recommended goals were reviewed by IEC at its October 23, 2020, meeting. Based on input from IEC and ASC, the following are the agreed upon goals. An update on this outcome was presented as an informational item to PAC at their October meeting.

          Table 2. Course Completion Rates and Mt. 91直播 Goals

          Course Completion Rates % 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22

          Institution-Set Standard (floor)

          70%

          71%

          72%

          72%

          72%

          72%

          stretch goal (aspirational)

               

          74%                   

          74% 

          74% 

          Course Completion Rate

          72%

          72%

          72%

          With EW Grade=69%

          Without EW Grade=78%

             

          Table 3. Certificates Awarded and Mt. 91直播 Goals

          Certificates (number) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22

          Institution-Set Standard (floor)

          666

          617

          588

          588

          588

          588

          stretch goal (aspirational)

               

          650

          650

          650

          Certificates Awarded (duplicated headcount)

          583   579 577 

          578

             

          Table 4. Associate Degrees Awarded and Mt. 91直播 Goals

          Degrees (number) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22

          Institution-Set Standard (floor)

          2,099

          2,175

          2,358

          2358

          2358

          2358

          stretch goal (aspirational)

               

          2700

          2700

          2700

          Associate Degrees  Awarded (duplicated headcount)

          2,212

          2,639

          3,713

          3313

             

          Table 5. Transfers to University of California (UC) and California State University (CSU) and Mt. 91直播 Goals

          Transfers (number) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22

          Institution-Set Standard (floor)

          1,749

          1,784

          1,799

          1800

          1800

          1800

          stretch goal (aspirational)

               

          1915

          1915

          1915

          Transfers

          1,859

          1,856

          1,909

          (Dec/Jan available)

             
    • Report on Quality Focus Essay: Progress and Outcomes from Action Projects

      Report on Quality Focus Essay: Progress and Outcomes from Action Projects:

      During the process of completing its Self-Evaluation, Mt. 91直播 identified three areas of focus in order to improve effectiveness. These three areas are:

      1. Integration of Metrics into 91直播 Review: the integration of Mt. 91直播 Strategic Plan Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Institution-set Standards (ISS) and indicators for the Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative (IEPI) at all levels of the Planning for Institutional Effectiveness (PIE) process;

      2. Integration of Plans: the integration of the Basic Skills, the Student Success and Support 91直播 (SSSP), and the Student Equity plans; and

      3. Pathways: the institutionalization of the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC) Pathways Project.

      What follows includes narrative of the progress for each area listed above as well as summary tables to outline the progress. Progress on goals, outcomes, and data are identified for each quality focus project as well as the changes in Student Achievement and Student Learning that resulted from the projects. If progress on projects was not achieved, then factors that contributed to that lack of progress are noted. If appropriate, the narrative also discusses expansion of the projects, the potential and intent to expand those projects to other areas of the College, and the ability to replicate these projects.  

        • Integration of Metrics into 91直播 Review

          Integration of Metrics into 91直播 Review

          The 2017 QFE integration of metrics focused on the following metrics aligning with learning outcomes and integrated into 91直播 Review (Planning for Institutional Effectiveness [PIE]: (1) Strategic Plan Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), (2) Institution-set Standards (ISS), and (3) indicators for the Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative (IEPI). Since that time, IEPI is no longer mandated by the Chancellor鈥檚 Office. Instead, the colleges must use the Student Success Metrics (SSM) dashboard which has metrics to support the Chancellor鈥檚 Vision for Success (VFS). While Mt. 91直播 does have a resource allocation process that links to student learning outcomes, the new inclusion of indicators and data into PIE leaves an opportunity to strengthen this. (5-qfe-1)

          The following timeline outlines the tasks that were undertaken by the Institutional Effectiveness Committee (IEC), various constituency groups, and units within the Mt. 91直播 community as well as the outcomes and the impact on academic quality and institutional effectiveness.

          Table 6. QFE-1. Timeline for Integration of Metrics into 91直播 Review

          Task Responsible Party Anticipated Outcomes Impact on Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness Timeline Done

          Determine method for authentic integration of KPIs ISS and IEPI into PIE

          IEC

          IEC will decide upon a method for ensuring the completion of the action plan.

          A method for ensuring deeper College- wide conversations of KPIs, ISS and IEPI will be in place.

          Fall 2016

          Yes

          Solicit input from constituency groups

          Constituency group representatives on IEC

          Constituency groups will have a voice in the work on the action plan.

          The process will have been one of collaboration, ensuring constituent group support.

          Spring 2017

          Yes

          Communicate the change to the College via IEC PIE Memo

          IEC

          The College will understand the new addition to the PIE process.

          The units will be able to analyze the KPI, ISS and IEPI data in addition to SLO data resulting in deeper analysis in anticipation of requests for resource allocation.

          Fall 2017

          Yes

          Have units respond to the change in their PIE documents

          Instructional and Student Services Units

          Units will integrate KPI, ISS and IEPI data with SLO data to encourage participation in College-wide goal setting processes.

          Cross-departmental discussion either between or within divisions will allow for the free-flow of ideas for student success related to College-wide indicators.

          Spring 2018

          Yes

          Evaluate the effectiveness of the change

          IEC

          IEC will be able to communicate the results of the integration to the College.

          The College can assess the results of the integration and determine the need to make changes to the process.

          Fall 2018

          Yes

          Have  College-wide discussions of the process

          Professional and Organizational Development (POD)

          POD will schedule discussions for personnel to discuss their response to the integration.

          The loop will be closed, resulting in a College-wide understanding of the integration of KPIs, ISS and IEPI with SLOs and resource allocation.

          Spring 2019

          Yes

          Throughout this process, the College chose to focus on metrics that would be most beneficial to improving student achievement and student learning. The College used the many external data mandates to provide structural support for engaging all units in the goal-setting process, to reflect on the findings, to engage in cross-department communications, and to further understand how these metrics can improve student success. The following are highlights of this work.

          PIE Dashboards

          To develop the PIE metric dashboards, a sub-group of IEC and others were asked to review the PIE process and improve upon it as per the previous year鈥檚 evaluation of PIE. Based on this evaluation, the team worked with the Research and Institutional Effectiveness (RIE) Department to create online dashboards within PIE that included basic metrics:

          • Educational Goals & Educational Plans

          • Enrollment Demographics

          • Course Enrollment

          • Course Success

          • Course Success by Subject

          • Course Retention

          • Distance Learning & Hybrid

          • Awards (certificates, degrees)

          • Transferring to University of California or California State University

          The project expanded to include noncredit within PIE. Beyond PIE and metric dashboards, many dashboards are now being created outside of PIE. RIE worked with a team of classified, faculty, and managers to customize dashboards for their student achievement metrics (e.g., course success, transfer). These dashboards allowed program data to support resource needs and decision making.

          91直播s, departments, and divisions are using the metrics to have structured conversations about what is working well and what could be done to improve upon it. The online metrics allow faculty to re-arrange the data from many different perspectives to explore what is working well and where there are needs for future attention. In addition, as divisions make decisions for action, they use the PIE metrics as one piece of data.

          Given the many different data dashboards across the College, at IEC鈥檚 fall 2020 meeting, members were presented with an opportunity to create a sub-committee to explore the dashboards. The purpose of the group was to determine if there is a need for developing common practices and layout of the data to minimize users having to re-learn where everything is on a dashboard depending on which group created it.

          The PIE dashboards were used more extensively in fall 2020 with the new Title V grant (Creating an Equity-minded Campus Culture to Improve Student Outcomes) supporting many faculty data coaches. It is because of excellent planning and foresight that these dashboards and the teams who create them are in place to support the faculty in this new role. Data Coaching is a campus initiative aimed at expanding the culture of inquiry at Mt. 91直播. Data coaches will be part of a cohort of faculty members who will provide direct support to their peers whereby educators work together to analyze student data, identify equity gaps, pilot new instructional strategies, and measure the impact of these new pedagogies on student outcomes. Imparting this information on a cross-section of the faculty will lead to greater instances of collaborative inquiry at Mt. 91直播. (5-qfe-2)

          Budget

          There are many budgeting processes on campus. Employees use their efforts within PIE to request funding per the metrics and other qualitative and quantitative indicators of needs. In the spirit of collaboration, IEC added a member from the Budget Committee on IEC and vice versa. This allows the two committees to better align their work on program review and budget planning.

          Board of Trustee Dialogue

          The Chancellor鈥檚 Vision for Success requires that Mt. 91直播 aligns its Strategic Plan local aspirational goals with the Vision for Success goals. The College did so via many governance meetings per the Board of Trustee meeting May 8, 2019, (Information Item; Action Item). As recently as June 2020, the Board of Trustees were also presented with an update on some of these integrated metrics with an equity component. This was a call to action and the Board responded with a resolution of support and action (Action Item; Resolution). (5-qfe-3, 5-qfe-4, 5-qfe-5, 5-qfe-6)

          Conclusion

          These metrics are evaluated as a natural extension of the PIE yearly evaluation process thus has a direct impact on academic quality and institutional effectiveness (e.g., student achievement and student learning). Because this action plan was accomplished and evaluated within PIE, it is an ongoing and sustainable institutional practice.

          Based on this extensive planning process, the QFE goals, outcomes were achieved, and substantial data was used as part of the PIE process. Beyond the plan, the data integration is taking on a life of its own across campus and will continue to expand with the support of the Title V grant.

        • Integration of Plans

          Integration of Plans

          The Quality Focus Essay in Mt. 91直播鈥檚 2017 Institutional Self Evaluation Report noted that

          In recent years, the CCCs [California Community Colleges] have committed to increasing access for the most marginalized students with the goal of improved outcomes, including progression and completion.鈥 For purposes of strengthening student outcomes, Mt. 91直播 will increase the integration among the SEP [Student Equity Plan], credit and noncredit SSSP [Student Success and Support 91直播], and Basic Skills Initiative (BSI) plans.

          Mt. 91直播鈥檚 plan was developed prior to the decision of the Chancellor鈥檚 Office to pursue this same strategy across the entire California community college system. Subsequent to the development of our QFE on Integration of Plans, the College has continued to make progress in this area by hosting campus-wide events and producing reports to demonstrate collaborative efforts to link equity-focused activities with Student Success mandates. Additionally, with the implementation of AB 705, Mt. 91直播 was able to institute a new, online assessment process using multiple measures for placement recommendation a year in advance of the statewide mandate. This required the collaboration of both credit and noncredit SSSP along with those who continued to work on BSI-related efforts. An additional aspect has been to consolidate all four categorical programs (SSSP credit, SSSP noncredit, Student Equity, and BSI) into one coordinated budget. The process involved reviewing all funded activities to ensure alignment with Student Equity goals. This resulted in a clearer and more equitably resourced plan for support services and learning/tutorial services that would enhance student learning and achievement, especially for disproportionately impacted students.

          Plans and Common Goals

          One of the greatest challenges the College faced was how to integrate all of the activities and budgets for the various programs and departments funded with Student Equity and Achievement 91直播 (SEAP) funds. The College鈥檚 goals for this initiative included: (1) making student equity a priority, (2) enhancing budgeting skills to get the work done, (3), breaking down silos, and (4) committing to collaboration among managers, faculty, and staff at the unit level as Mt. 91直播 has a long history of making equity a priority, but the separation of categorial funds into different silos, with different reporting requirement and deadlines, was an obstacle to the College鈥檚 capacity to integrate its efforts. As a start towards integration, the College had to first separate and then analyze these categorical funding streams. Prior to the College beginning this work, managers and staff were challenged to keep track of overlaps or gaps in Basic Skills, Student Equity, and Student Success and Support 91直播 funding. Over the past two years, the College has addressed the commitment indicated in the original QFE as well as responded to the call for integration directed by the Chancellor鈥檚 Office SEA 91直播. Specifically, the College has established budgetary procedures to provide units across the campus with the ability to set priorities for funding and to monitor progress toward meeting the college鈥檚 goals, as reflected in the following chart:

          Mt. 91直播 New Budget Structure Chart long description following

          The Mt. 91直播 New Budget Structure chart illustrates the prior structure consisting of four main areas: Credit SSSP, Noncredit SSSP, Student Equity (SE), and Basic Skills Initiative containing 200 organization and 1,662 accounts. It also illustrates the new budget structure consisting of three main areas: President鈥檚 Office, Instruction, and Student Services, with projects under each area and consisting of twenty-five organizations and 600 accounts. Furthermore, the chart includes the SEAP Total of $12,135,975 with $8,029,631 going to salaries and benefits for 65 positions and $4,106,344 going to operating Expenses.

          Although there are three distinct budgetary cost centers, there is a synergy among the three to implement SEAP goals. Updates on the work of SEA 91直播 integration with regards to budget are provided in the President's Cabinet notes, which are made public. At the March 3, 2020, meeting the following progress was reported:

          Cabinet was joined by Madelyn Arballo, Associate Vice President, School of Continuing Education, and Rosa Royce, Chief Compliance and College Budget Officer, who provided an update ... on the SEAP Management Workgroup. There has been good management discussion on reviewing past SEAP allocations, with deep discussion specifically on SEAP funded positions. There is now a template for a fiscal account structure which will align all programs and services within the SEAP guidelines.... Rosa provided a graphic of the new structure of the allocation accounts for SEAP. (5-qfe-7)

          Although the SEAP Management Workgroup was heavily focused on re-structuring the budget as part of the integration of services, equity and achievement were the primary filters. Specifically, budget expenditures were carefully evaluated to maximize resources that promote student success, and more importantly, narrow the achievement gap for underrepresented students. As part of this effort, the workgroup supported resources that promoted the alignment and integration of academic support centers, led to discussions on the development of a SEA 91直播 professional development plan and research plan, and created a clear presence for programs with non-traditional populations.

          In addition to the directing of funding to Instruction and Student Services, the President鈥檚 Office is using SEAP funding to focus on the equity needs of the College鈥檚 African American and Latinx communities. All of these efforts are further reinforced by the College鈥檚 Professional and Organizational Development Office.

          The College continues to strengthen coordination and collaboration between Instruction and Student Services. In addition, as the largest provider of noncredit education in the California community college system, these efforts have also been integrated with the College鈥檚 noncredit programs including Guided Pathways.

          The following table indicates the work undertaken by the College, the anticipated outcomes and timeline for the work, what has been accomplished, and demonstrates that the College has made considerable progress toward integrated planning.

          Table 7. QFE-2. Timeline for Integration of Plans

          Task Responsible Party Anticipated Outcomes Impact on Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness Timeline Done?

          Gather stakeholders and determine structure for ongoing dialogue

          Committee chairs

          Coordination and collaboration among stakeholders; Understanding of each plan; Overlaps and differences of plans

          Alignment with other plans

          Spring 2017

          Yes

          Gap analysis for services to students and filling the gap

          Committee chairs, Pathways to Transfer manager

          Identify how services are delivered throughout the student鈥檚 educational lifespan

          Compile a joint gap analysis of campus services for disproportionately impacted and low skilled students; Scale up

          2018- 2020

          Yes

          Gap analysis for services to students and filling the gap

          Committee chairs, Pathways to Transfer manager

          Identify redundancies, and outdated gaps, and overlaps

          Students will have thorough and appropriate assessment and referrals from the first point of contact

          2019- 2021

          In progress

          Establish a SEAP budget structure that recognizes the consolidation of BSI, Student Equity, and SSSP funds that will promote the goals and objectives of the SEA 91直播.

          SEAP Workgroup (2019-2020)

          Shift of budget control to service centers to allow managers more direct control and accountability for services provided

          Create a budget workgroup to consolidate budgets and examine expenditures as they relate to SEA 91直播 objectives.

          2019-2021

          In progress

          Identify the goals for the integrated plan and data needs

          Committee chairs

          Data will guide goal setting for the integrated plan and may inform the creation of a success dashboard.

          Improved student achievement data

          2017-2020

          In Progress

          Evaluation of Impact

          Committee chairs

          Evaluate functionality and outcomes. The ongoing nature of these funding resources indicates sustainable support for students.

          Redesigned structure provides support to students at an improved level

          Fall 2017- 2020

          In Progress

          Professional development

          Committee chairs, POD

          Synthesis of the topic of Institutional Planning (IP)

          Application of IP with multiple plans

          Application of IEPI IP Tools

          Use of Professional Learning Network, Lynda.com, etc.

          Improved alignment among support centers and COP consisting of support center staff and faculty

          Improved understanding of IP and its applied application to the College

          Academic Support Center Community of Practice workshops

          Spring 2017- 2020

          Yes

          Even though there have been many instances of positive student outcomes as a result of individual plans and resources, successes are being scaled up with a combined focus of how Mt. 91直播 provides services throughout the student lifespan and how achievement can be improved for disproportionately impacted students.

          Coordination of Academic Support Resources

          Reflecting the intent of integrated planning, one example is how the College has made significant strides to provide academic support services to all students through coordination among a rich array of services. A team of workgroups comprised of faculty, staff, and administrators focus on marketing, outcomes assessment, planning and resources, hiring, and tutor training. This work resulted in improved coordinated efforts, for example, to promote academic support resources to faculty and students, including Student Success Fairs on campus and student-centrically organized webpages for easier wayfinding. Another coordinated effort is common data gathering across these centers so that the College has more complete data on student usage of these resources, by demographic groups, and indications for data gaps that may need to be addressed. Faculty leaders in these academic support centers have played a crucial role in advocating for greater visibility of these resources to faculty and students and for closer integration of instruction with student services. To this end, data shared at the Fall 2019 Inclusion Summit showed that 51% of students at Mt. 91直播 used tutoring in 2018-19. The work to coordinate academic support centers has occurred concurrently as the SEAP budget integration, which assured that each support center had consistent allocations of funding.

          Below describes how Mt. 91直播 provides services in a wide variety of project, tutorial, and student cohort areas, including:

          Student Services:

          • ACCESS (DSP&S) including the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) Center and the Accessible Technology Resource Center
          • ACES (Achieving in College, Ensuring Success) federal TRiO grant
          • Admissions and Records and Assessment
          • ARISE (federal AANAPISI grant 鈥 Asian American Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institution)
          • ASPIRE (African American Student 91直播 Inspiring Responsibility for Education/Umoja)
          • Associated Students
          • Basic Needs (food pantry; housing assistance)
          • Bridge (freshmen learning communities)
          • Career & Transfer Centers
          • Completion Center
          • Counseling
          • DREAM
          • El Centro (Latinx focused program)
          • Extended Opportunity 91直播s and Services (EOPS)/Cooperative Agencies
          • Extended Opportunity 91直播s and Services (EOPS)/Cooperative Agencies Resources for Education (CARE)/CalWORKs
          • Financial Aid and Scholarships
          • Gray and Redshirt Academic Support 91直播 (GRASP)
          • Health Center and Mental Health Services
          • High School Outreach and Inreach Services
          • International Student Center
          • Minority Male Initiative (MMI)
          • Promise Plus 91直播 (AB 19 Promise funds)
          • REACH (Realizing Educational Achievement through Caring and Heart) foster youth/former foster youth
          • Rising Scholars (formerly incarcerated)
          • Student Life and Associated Students Government
          • Upward Bound (federal TRiO grant)
          • Veterans Resource Center

          Instruction:

          • Academic Support and Achievement Center (A91直播)
          • Adult Basic Education Learning Center
          • Business Division Computer Lab
          • Deaf and Hard of Hearing Center
          • Design Lab
          • Health Careers Resource Center
          • Honors 91直播
          • Language Learning Center/Language Lab
          • Math Activities Resource Center (MARC)
          • Math Success Lab
          • Natural Sciences Computer Lab
          • Pride Center
          • REACH (Reaching, Empowering, Achieving, and Completing with Heart 91直播)
          • STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Center
          • Speech and Sign Success Center
          • Tech Education Resource Center (TERC)
          • Transfer Math Activities Resource Center/Math and Computer Science Lab (TMARC)
          • WIN 91直播 (Academic Support for Student Athletes)
          • Writing Center

          A majority of these centers receive full or partial funding from the integrated SEAP funding. In addition, student equity activities and funding have been provided to Professional and Organizational Development, Research and Institutional Effectiveness, and Information Technology which are all documented in the College鈥檚 updated Student Equity Plan. In order to bring greater consistency to these programs, the President鈥檚 Cabinet prioritized the hiring of a manager who would be responsible to assure consistency of service offerings and to support the work of faculty and staff in assessing their effectiveness and developing plans for improvement.

          To continue integration of plans, services, and funding, a SEAP Work Plan is presently under development detailing the specific activities and outcomes, as well as disproportionately impacted student populations to be served through SEAP funds.

          Based on this extensive planning process, the QFE goals, outcomes were achieved, and substantial integration of the plans is evident in the SEA 91直播.

        • Pathways

          Pathways

          At Mt. 91直播 Guided Pathways to Success is about collaborating, innovating, and integrating equity-based practices. Above all we strive to keep students at the center of our work and make it easier for students to get the help they need every step of their community college experience. Based on the 2017 ISER, the following timeline outlines the tasks that were predicted to be undertaken and the anticipated outcomes and impact on academic quality and institutional effectiveness.

          Table 8. QFE-3. Timeline for Pathways

          Task Responsible Party Anticipated Outcomes Impact on Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness Timeline Done

          20+ programs will evaluate course sequence

          Content faculty and counselors

          Content faculty and counselors will collaborate on guided pathway sequencing

          91直播s are reviewed for appropriateness to student needs

          Fall 2016

          Yes

          Contextualized learning is offered in five developmental education courses

          Content and basic skills faculty

          Content faculty and basic skills faculty will collaborate to enhance existing curriculum with relevant content

          Student are engaged earlier in academic career increasing persistence

          Spring 2017

          Yes

          20 more programs will evaluate course sequence

          Content faculty and counselors

          Content faculty and counselors will agree on guided pathway sequencing

          Collaboration between content and counseling faculty for developing appropriate course sequencing

          Spring 2017

          Yes

          All remaining programs will evaluate course sequence

          Department Chairs

          All programs will complete evaluation of course sequencing for programs and degrees

          Collaboration between content and counseling faculty for developing appropriate course sequencing

          Fall 2017

          Yes

          Contextualized courses are offered in 10 percent of developmental education courses

          Office of Instruction and Department Chairs

          Contextualized developmental education courses are offered across all career clusters

          Increased student persistence through developmental education sequences

          Spring 2018

          Yes

          Career clusters will inform enrollment management

          Counselors and Department Chairs

          Student career choices assist in determination of course offerings 

          Student needs met through strengthened enrollment management

          Spring 2018

          Yes

          Educational Plans will inform enrollment management

          Counselors

          Student Education plans assist in determination of course offerings

          Time to completion shortened with increase in student success.

          Fall 2018

          Yes

          New program offerings will include mandatory course sequence and mapping

          Department Chairs

          Course sequencing and mapping included in new program proposals

          Research demonstrates increased student persistence and completion

          Spring 2019

          Yes

          50 percent of developmental education courses offer contextualized learning

          Office of Instruction

          Contextualized developmental education courses are offered across all career clusters

          Increased student persistence through developmental education sequences with higher completion rates.

          Spring 2019

          No

          Based on this extensive planning process, the QFE goals, outcomes were achieved, and substantial pathways work and progress has focused on the following five key areas:

          Creating and Institutionalizing a Structure

          Guided Pathways to Success at Mt. 91直播 began with the goal of removing obstacles to build a stronger student experience. To build course sequence recommendations to completion, a large workgroup was created along with three subgroups housing Research, Onboarding, and Ensuring Learning. The Academic Senate appointed faculty coordinators to help manage the workgroup and subgroups. In addition, other faculty positions related to professional development and program mapping were created. In total, Guided Pathways has provided up to 60 units of reassigned time each year. In addition to faculty, the College hired a dedicated Senior Research Analyst, Web Developer, Administrative Specialist for professional development, Career Services Specialist, and Transfer Specialist to support this work. The work of Guided Pathways has been collegial since its adoption; in the 2019-20 academic year, the work group became a standing governance committee, and two of the subgroups became independent academic senate committees. The research group integrated into the existing outcomes committee. Through the integration of the various components of Guided Pathways to Success, equity-based and student-centered institutionalized change is occurring.

          While there are many notable structural supports that have been implemented under Guided Pathways to Success, we would like to highlight mapping pathways and our academic support program alignment. Mapping at Mt. 91直播 began as a series of summits in 2016. Instructional and Counseling faculty worked collectively to discuss and plan the best course of action students could take to successfully complete their educational goals. This fostered dialogue about full-time and part-time students, course rigor, availability of courses, basic skills, support, and equity, which also allowed for shared appreciation of the expertise of the work that students, staff, faculty, and administrators do on campus. The highlight for many was the opportunity to engage in critical conversations and learn from each other. These summits provided the framework for building liaison relationships between counseling, library, and other discipline faculty across campus. Further, this work emphasized the need for a more robust early alert system that closes the loop to provide broad support for students (the early alert system is one part of the college鈥檚 implementation of EAB Navigate).

          While mapping the student experience is integral in the adoption of Guided Pathways to Success, streamlining support is also important. The College provides extensive support for students through a multitude of equity and academic support programs. The Guided Pathways to Success team prioritized marketing support opportunities with a Mountie Viewbook publication and dedicated webpages to provide unified commitment to academic support for students and programs to promote their personal growth. The team is currently working on ensuring that the support programs are consistent in employee training and supervision and are streamlined in attendance. Overall, work to institutionalize the Guided Pathways to Success (GPS) framework into existing campus structure is ongoing.

          The Student Experience

          Mt. 91直播 has unparalleled academic and student services support programs such as 11 main tutoring centers and 18 other academic support programs, 65 recognized student clubs and organizations (RSCOs), internships, work experience, project-based learning, clinical experiences, research opportunities, competitive teams, financial aid, and more. Mt. 91直播鈥檚 GPS is capitalizing on this robust infrastructure to create an even more supportive environment to help students conquer challenges they encounter and stay on the path to meet their goals. For thousands of students, the onboarding experience at 91直播 begins in the summer. The College has provided a Summer Bridge 91直播 for over 20 years and a Summer Transition Enrichment 91直播 (STEP) for over a decade. Combined, the two programs provide support for approximately 1,000 new students, mostly first in their family to attend college. Mt. 91直播 has aligned the Summer 2019 experience with the College Promise program and termed it Promise Plus. With Promise Plus, the STEP 91直播 was re-envisioned utilizing the tenets of Guided Pathways. STEP students undergo a two-week orientation allowing them to earn one semester unit by taking an Introduction to College course. The course content was redesigned to focus on career and major concepts and navigating the college with support. Faculty and staff across campus provided a wide variety of workshops to prepare students for fall coursework. Counseling faculty attended a 3-day intensive professional development workshop, Teaching from the Back of the Room, to provide a pedagogical foundation for them to create an engaging, interactive, and memorable experience for these new students.

          Not all students are able to begin college in the summer, and many apply in summer for the fall term. To provide early career intervention and conversation, the Counseling Department facilitates Mountie Academic Plan (MAP) workshops. In the workshops, students are introduced to the Guided Pathways Career Clusters through a guided career activity. Students are supported in the creation of a first-semester educational plan and are introduced to important content for students entering college for the first time such as navigating their student portal, registration, and academic support, including college counseling. In addition to MAP workshops, Student Services provides a peer-maintained registration workshop called Mountie Fast Track to assist students with registration and registration-related issues.

          In collaboration, counseling and instructional faculty have been hard at work since 2016 to help clarify the path for students to complete their education and employment goals by creating GPS maps that provide course sequence recommendations. Moreover, Counseling faculty have used these maps to create templates in Degree Works (a degree audit tool) for Mt. 91直播 students to use in creating academic plans or to modify these maps to fit the students鈥 diverse needs. Currently, all 300+ programs have course sequence maps for students to be able to see their educational pathway at Mt. 91直播. In addition, all programs also have specialized course sequence maps designed specifically for transfer to Cal Poly Pomona. Course sequence maps are made available to students, faculty, and staff on a dedicated Guided Pathways website, appear as links in the college catalog, are embedded in educational planning software, and are visible on department webpages to use as a recruitment and onboarding tool. Students have year-round access to advising appointments in various formats to meet their needs (e.g., face-to-face, online, and over the phone). Pathways maps also have content related to support through credit and noncredit programs, completion, and other milestones based on the program of study. Pathways maps are continually updated in collaboration with content and counseling faculty as needed. This collaboration has strengthened relationships amongst faculty and has provided much needed context as faculty understand how students progress through their intended program of study. 91直播 maps inform course needs and assist faculty and administration in scheduling and planning. Currently, noncredit pathways maps are being created. These maps allow students to better understand pathways through non-native English programs, career education, and noncredit to credit pathways so that students can experience options and opportunities across the college.

          The offices of Instruction and Research and Institutional Effectiveness (RIE) have partnered and developed a new Enrollment Information Tool (EIT) that helps department chairs and deans develop a more student-centered schedule to help the students complete their pathways. The EIT tool currently provides three important enrollment reports: 1- Day-Over-Day Analysis; 2- Historical Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) and Enrollment Analysis, and 3- Course Fill Rates. We will be providing soon a Course and 91直播 Success Rate report to help keep us focused on ensuring students are entering and completing their pathways.

          To facilitate intentional exploration of careers and opportunities within a general field of study, Mt. 91直播 has developed 10 Career Clusters (i.e., Meta Majors). Career Clusters group programs of study according to the student鈥檚 perspective and help students make connections between their studies and different career tracks. Career Clusters are also aligned to the Holland Code (the Holland Code is a widely used diagnostic tool used to help students identify career pathways suited to them). These Career Clusters are used along with the GPS course sequence recommendation maps in MAP workshops, career counseling, and undecided workshops to help students identify pathways of interest and are integrated on the College website and Catalog to facilitate exploration. Further, GPS supports Mt. 91直播鈥檚 commitment to career education by supporting a robust array of career inventory information organized by courses, providing career specialists campuswide to help with work experience, implementing software such as Career Coach, and ensuring career and salary information (labor market statistics evidence) is integrated into CE (Career Education) programs. (5-qfe-8)

          The Guided Pathways team created a career task force to further collegial conversation and action that will support stronger engagement in the alignment of personal and career exploration through assessment, college major decision-making, undecided-major intervention, coursework, skill development, mentoring, resume support, work experience, internships, job shadowing, and job placement. The task force recommended participation in the California Career Development Association, and Mt. 91直播 has become the San Gabriel Chapter Chair and hosted the state conference. They also recommended the adoption of Career Coach software to help students engage in college programs that align with learning opportunities at Mt. 91直播. To better understand career development at the college, the task force sent a collegewide survey requesting information on how faculty, staff and managers support this work with students. Currently, the task force is working on a virtual career hub to house all career related areas to provide equitable access to Mt. 91直播 students.

          Equity and access are the cornerstone of supporting students in the educational pathway. Mt. 91直播 is not only geographically a large institution, the student population of over 60,000 credit and noncredit students creates challenges in reaching students in need in a timely manner. While many of the support programs utilized a progress check for early alert and intervention, it was important that the College better utilize technology to create a more robust support system for all students. The College is in the implementation stage with EAB Navigate to support early alert and better leverage data to target students who could benefit from academic intervention. EAB Navigate also provides the opportunity to close the gap and notify those who activate the alert so that they can provide follow up.

          Supporting Innovation

          To be more inclusive of all faculty doing meaningful work on campus and to empower faculty to continue doing this work, Guided Pathways created two funding opportunities to inspire and support faculty innovation and exploration of tools and strategies to engage students: Mini-Grants and RISE (Re-Imagining the Student Experience).

          The College has allocated $150,000 of the GPS categorical funding annually (for the duration of the grant) to fund Mini-Grants. Mini-Grants are intended to support cross-disciplinary and campuswide projects in both instructional and student service areas. Project proposals are competitively evaluated using a rubric to ensure they are student-centered and equity-minded and align with the GPS framework and goals. Projects funded during the first year of implementation in 2019-2020 included a Mountie View Book and signpost banners developed by Marketing, an interactive career exploration guided developed by Biology faculty, a professional development workshop called Teaching from the Back of the Room, and a collaboration between Physics and Engineering faculty at Mt. 91直播 and Cal Poly Pomona to better advise students on course sequencing and improve alignment of transfer degrees. In collaboration, Physics and Engineering faculty at Mt. 91直播 and Cal Poly Pomona collaboratively applied for an National Science Foundation grant to continue the institutionalization of this work and further address career readiness and student success in this major pathway.

          To expand support for faculty innovation, four RISE projects were developed in fall 2019 with intended implementation in spring 2020, in most cases deferred to fall 2020 because of COVID-19. For RISE projects, Guided Pathways is providing funding to every department for a faculty member or a team of faculty to propose and implement a small project to improve their program. RISE projects differ from Mini-Grants in that they are intended to be smaller scale and one semester projects that are not competitively awarded. Rather, funds are equitably distributed across all departments to support large-scale participation. The goals of RISE are to increase the number and disciplines of faculty involved in the work of GPS, improve communication and collaboration between faculty and staff across disciplines (e.g., instruction faculty, counseling faculty, library faculty, and other student service programs), utilize GPS funding to create long-term program improvement based on best practices outlined in the Scale of Adoption Self-Assessment (SOAA) and the autonomy and unique needs of our College program areas.

          Creating Community

          GPS has led, organized, and/or supported multiple opportunities for faculty, staff, and administrators to engage in collaborative, student-center, and equity-based professional development designed to create a campus wide sense of community. From the earliest days of GPS implementation, Mt. 91直播 has prioritized inclusion across the college. Beginning in 2016, the GPS workgroup organized multiple planning summits to inform the campus community of the GPS framework and bring together instructional faculty, counseling faculty, and student services in the planning and creation of career clusters (i.e., meta-majors) and recommended course sequences.

          Presentations to campus on the ongoing work of GPS have continued to be incorporated into other campus events such as Mt. 91直播鈥檚 annual Inclusion Summit, the Region 8 & 9 Meeting, and the Board of Trustees Study Session. The New Faculty Seminar, which provides new faculty with information and resources essential to successfully navigating the first year of full-time faculty employment at the college, has also deeply integrated the GPS framework. The New Faculty Seminar provides foundations in areas such as evidence-based teaching, curriculum, course design, improving student success, and reducing achievement gaps. Simultaneously, the seminar fosters connection between faculty across disciplines and builds awareness of opportunities for involvement in campuswide activities and governance. Further, Mt. 91直播 has also hosted other community colleges (Monterey Peninsula College and Moreno Valley College) and traveled to provide onsite consultation (Victor Valley College), to share our experience and process for GPS implementation.

          In spring 2019, the GPS workgroup, in collaboration with the College鈥檚 Professional & Organizational Development (POD) and the Faculty Professional Development Committee (FPDC), organized the first Mountie Faculty Focus Retreat. This retreat was a professional development opportunity that provided faculty with a space to gather, share, and inspire each other. During this retreat, faculty engaged in discussions and participated in active learning experiences which modeled how to use evidence-based practices to embed Equity and the Guided Pathways framework in their pedagogy. Faculty collaborated across disciplines on strategies to increase student success, enhance engagement, and close equity gaps. As a result of this successful retreat, the GPS work group has decided to continue to organize and fund an annual retreat for the duration of the GPS grant. Ongoing goals of the retreat are to bring a diverse group of full-time and part-time faculty across all disciplines together to create and promote a campuswide Community of Practice, connect faculty to their role in achieving Guided Pathways objectives, and engage faculty in dialogue and/or planning about Guided Pathways implementation and pedagogy.

          Research

          Guided Pathways at Mt. 91直播 is also committed to research, data, and evidence-based practices to improve student success. The GPS team works closely with Research and Institutional Effectiveness to conduct research projects and disseminate relevant findings that guide our work. Additionally, GPS highlights the importance of research by funding a dedicated full-time Research Analyst for GPS work. The College participates in the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) and has added specific questions for understanding and assessing principles of GPS from the student perspective. At the GPS Mountie Faculty Focus Retreat in spring 2019, the CCSSE data was reviewed with faculty in a workshop designed to facilitate their exposure to and understanding of the importance of such data. Faculty were encouraged to brainstorm solutions for addressing identified areas of improvement. To further engage faculty, staff, and administrators in understanding important data, the GPS research analysis has created gamification activities.

          Students are also regularly involved in research projects. The GPS team has used focus groups to test the utilization of software, the navigation of websites, and the appropriateness of the language used to communicate with students. One specific project investigated student pathways and experiences through college qualitatively by having students draw their pathway and indicate roadblocks and accomplishments. The project also allowed students to validate each other's statements, which provided greater depth to student voice. This project was used to highlight the importance of student perspectives and was presented at a Faculty FLEX day as a method by which faculty could humanize their students and create a more student-centered environment in the classroom.

          Further, to increase campuswide data awareness, a GPS workgroup organized the Power of Our Data conference. The conference was designed with a focus on three key areas; 1) celebrate the contributions to research that College faculty completed during sabbatical leave, 2) leverage the on-campus research completed by College employees in their graduate studies and 3) showcase examples of research-based teaching and learning. The conference was designed to engage participants in an interactive workshop series with a focus on using Mt. 91直播 data to increase knowledge of one another and our students. Unfortunately, the conference was postponed due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the College remains committed to its components and will continue collaborative work efforts on campus. Guided Pathways reform underscores the importance of data coaching. The Guided Pathways research team has collaborated with the Title V grant team to design an on-campus data coaching program that will be launched during the 2020-21 academic year.

          Finally, the culmination of the GPS work has been summarized and reported in the Scale of Adoption Assessment (SOAA) provided by the Chancellor鈥檚 office. The SOAA was compiled by the Guided Pathways Cross Committee and was shared widely on campus to generate a broad understanding of the work being completed.

    • Most Recent Annual Reports Submitted by College

      Most Recent Annual Reports Submitted by College:

      Per the College鈥檚 Fiscal Services, the most recent 2020 Annual Fiscal Report for the College is included. Based on this report, it is evident that the College is meeting all its fiscal goals. Its Financial Aid Default rates are within acceptable rates for community colleges. The College is not on enhanced fiscal monitoring. The College鈥檚 2020 Annual Report on student achievement is also attached and indicates good progress in its efforts.

    • Appendices

      Appendix A: List of Evidence

      Name in text Reference Full name
      Quality Focus Essay 2-plans-1 2-plans-1-quality-focus-e
      Visiting Team鈥檚 Evaluation, 2017 3-qual-1 3-qual-1-visiting-team-e
      Outcomes Committee Minutes, September 19, 2017 3-qual-2 3-qual-2-outcom-09-19-17
      Outcomes Committee Minutes, October 3, 2017 3-qual-3 3-qual-3-outcom-10-03-17
      Academic Senate Resolution 16-09 3-qual-4 3-qual-4-ac-sen-16-09
      Outcomes Committee Minutes, November 21, 2017 3-qual-5 3-qual-5-outcom-11-21-17
      Academic Senate Minutes, April 12, 2018 3-qual-6 3-qual-6-ac-sen-04-12-18
      Fall 2020 Syllabi Smartsheet form 3-qual-7 3-qual-7-bus-syllabus
      College Catalog, 2020-2021 3-qual-8 3-qual-8-catalog
      Nursing 91直播 Exams 3-qual-9 3-qual-9-nursing-exams
      Academic Senate Minutes, September 19, 2019 3-qual-10 3-qual-10-senate-09-19-19
      Academic Senate Executive Board Task Force on Structure 3-qual-11 3-qual-11-task-structure
      Outcomes Committee Goals and Progress Reports 2017-2018 4-perf-1 4-perf-1-out-goal-17-18
      American Educational Research Association: What is Education Research 4-perf-2 4-perf-2-ed-rsrch
      Application Marston Music 4-perf-3 4-perf-3-marston
      NF 10 SLO Data 4-perf-4 4-perf-4-nf10-slo-data
      Bio1 Active Learning Data 4-perf-5 4-perf-5-bio1-al-data
      Student Success Metrics (SSM) dashboard 5-qfe-1 5-qfe-1-ssm-dashboard
      Data Coaches 5-qfe-2 5-qfe-2-data-coaching
      Board of Trustees Agenda, May 8, 2019, Information Item 5-qfe-3 5-qfe-3-bot-05-08-19
      Board of Trustees Agenda, May 8, 2019, Action Item 5-qfe-4 5-qfe-4-bot-action-05-08-19
      Board of Trustees Agenda, June 24, 2020, Action Item 5-qfe-5 5-qfe-5-bot-action-05-24-20
      Board of Trustees Agenda, June 24, 2020, Resolution 5-qfe-6 5-qfe-6-bot-res-05-24-20
      President鈥檚 Cabinet Action Notes, March 3, 2020 5-qfe-7 5-qfe-7-cabinet-03-03-20
      Meta Majors 5-qfe-8 5-qfe-8-meta-majors
      ACCJC 2020 Annual Fiscal Report 6-ar-1 6-ar-1-accjc-2020-fiscal
      ACCJC 2020 Annual Report 6-ar-2 6-ar-2-accjc-2020-annual
      List of Acronyms append-2 append-2-acronyms

       

      Appendix B: List of Acronyms

      Acronym Full Name or Description
      AACC American Association of Community College
      AB 705 Assembly Bill 705
      ACCJC Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges
      AMAC Academic Mutual Agreement Council
      A91直播 Academic Support and Achievement Center
      ASC Accreditation Steering Committee
      ASCP American Society for Clinical Pathology
      BSI Basic Skills Initiative
      CCC California Community Colleges
      CCC SOAA California Community Colleges Scale of Adoption Self-Assessment
      CCSSE Community College Survey of Student Engagement
      CE Career Education
      DLC Distance Learning Committee
      EIT Enrollment Information Tool
      ER Education Research
      FAA Federal Aviation Administration
      FA Faculty Association
      FT Full Time
      FTE Full-time Equivalent
      GPS Guided Pathways to Success 
      IA Item Analysis
      IEC Institutional Effectiveness Committee
      IEPI Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative
      ILOs Institutional Learning Outcomes
      ISER Institutional Self-Evaluation Report
      ISS Institution-set Standards
      KPI/KPIs Key Performance Indicators
      MAP Mountie Academic Plan
      NCLEX National Council Licensure Examination 
      NF 10 Nutrition for Personal Health and Health
      OC Outcomes Committee
      PAC President鈥檚 Advisory Council
      PIE Planning for Institutional Effectiveness
      PLOs 91直播 Level Outcomes
      POD Professional and Organizational Development
      PT Part Time
      QFE Quality Focus Essay
      RISE Re-Imagining the Student Experience 
      RIE Research and Institutional Effectiveness
      SEA/SEAP Student Equity and Achievement 91直播
      SEP Student Equity Plan
      SLO/SLOs Student Learning Outcomes
      SSSP Student Success and Support 91直播
      STEP Summer Transition Enrichment 91直播
      TC Tutors in the Classroom
      VFS Vision for Success
      VTNE Veterinary Technician鈥檚 National Exam
      WC Writing Center